We just passed our first year using the Fujitsu 12RLS for heating, with the exception of a 7-1/2 day period in early February when I switched back to the oil boiler to get some data, which was equal to about 5% of the HDD65s in this one year period. The heat pump energy consumption at the meter was 1,366 kWh - adding the missing 5% brings the consumption up to about 1,441 kWh/year. I don't know if that is the full number, as we have learned that the electromechanical meters don't always pick up the low wattage periods of consumption. The HP was off at the breaker for close to 6 months, May - October.
This works out to about 0.28 kWh/HDD65. We keep the first floor bedroom and bath closed off and they only are heated by conduction through the walls. The remaining gsf of the house is about 1,300. So heating is about 0.73 BTU/sf/HDD65 in terms of input energy. If the Fujitsu is operating at an overall COP of 3, then heating demand is about 2.2 BTU/sf/HDD65, which is believable - a little lower than I'd expect, but we don't keep it at 70F unless we're there and awake (70F under those conditions, 66F otherwise).
I've got Hobos set-up now logging temps on the main floor where the HP is, the bedroom upstairs, the basement, and outdoors, so I'll have a better idea of performance as we move through the winter. Overall, we're very pleased with this gizmo. I think we've paid about 1/4 the cost of what we would have if we'd used the oil boiler instead!
I wonder if using HDD65 is realistic for a well insulated house. When the outside temperature is 65 °F you'll probably get 70 °F indoors even without any use of the heat pump, just heat leakage from the domestic hot water tank, sunlight through the windows, light bulbs, human and dog heat, etc.
If you have the raw data then it might be worth working out your kWh/HDD for, say, each month. Using those figures play with the HDD base to determine the best fit: the base which gives the most consistent kWh/HDD.
Still, 280 Wh/HDD Fahrenheit is 21 W/K (watts per degree Kelvin, Centigrade or Celsius) which is pretty good. Even with a COP of 3 on the heat pump that's 63 W/K - I'm estimating 45 W/K for a house with half the floor area. Still, a smaller house will have proportionally a larger surface area and so, per square foot or metre of floor area, a larger loss so your numbers validate that I've got reasonably realistic numbers. Thanks for that.
Posted by: Ed Davies | 12/29/2011 at 12:50 PM
Hello Ed, thanks for your comment. I'm not sure what the balance point is of this house, it's likely 60F or less I'm guessing. And I'm pretty sure that the building heat loss coefficient is more than 63W/K - it's hard to go from consumption directly to heat loss coefficient. I do know that through the coldest weather last winter - lowest outdoor temp was 7F - the HP used about 0.9 kW. This indicates either a better COP or a lower heat loss coefficient than I think - a lot closer to the number you calculate.
Posted by: Marc Rosenbaum | 12/29/2011 at 05:45 PM
Mini-split COP is extremely variable with outdoor temperature and compressor & fan speeds- at 35F outdoor temp the COP of a 12RLS at lowest comp hits around 4.5, but at highest speed is barely half that. (Ecotope has been studying this in some depth for the BPA- the condensed version relevant to this discussion can be found at www.nrel.gov/docs/fy11osti/52175.pdf - see the COP graphic on p18.) It's tough to fully model the heat loss of your house without the room by room temp and solar data, but it's conceivable that as-operated your average COP could easily exceed 3.
This makes a case for oversizing mini-splits by 1.5-2x for the load. As fully modulating systems with a significant turn-down ratio, they would not short-cycle into low efficiency or an early grave at 2x oversizing, but would bump the average operating speeds down for higher average COP. If most track similarly to the 12RLS (and they should) it would yield a huge net jump in average operating efficiency- a half-COP point or more.
Posted by: dana | 12/30/2011 at 11:43 AM
Excellent Blog! I really admire your thinking and the way you have put these information in this post. Thanks for sharing an informative post.
Posted by: IQF freezer | 12/30/2011 at 12:06 PM
Dana, thank you for your comment. I completely agree with your points and have been following the Ecotope work. The one place we're not oversizing so much is with ducted units because it drives duct size up.
Posted by: Marc Rosenbaum | 12/30/2011 at 01:20 PM
I don't understand the Fujitsu spec, which lists an outdoor design temp of 47 F DB. Does this mean the unit produces no heat below 47 F outside temp? It sound like yours produced heat even at 7 F outdoor temp.
Posted by: Jijm Shipsky | 05/25/2012 at 06:51 PM
Heat pumps are rated in heating nominally at 47F. Fujitsu's sizing is great for predominantly heating climates. The 12RLS (now the 12RLS2) is a nominal one ton unit (12,000 BTU/hour is a ton), and at standard rating conditions for cooling it is one ton. It's heating output is much higher - at 47F it is rated at 22,000 BTU/hour, and at -5F it is rated at 15,000 BTU/hour. So it's really sized well for small efficient houses in a heating climate, where peak heating exceeds peak cooling load.
Posted by: Marc Rosenbaum | 05/26/2012 at 08:51 AM
I live on a Gulf Island (Gabriola) on the coast of British Columbia. This is a predominantly heating climate with moderated extremes so it never gets too cold (20 F would be a rare cold day). In response to government sponsored energy grants for high efficiency systems a group on this island (Sustainable Gabriola) has arrange to bring in and install close to 100 of the 12RLS and the new 12RLS2 in this small community. This provides an opportunity for checking reliability and customer satisfaction over a wide range of conditions. The experience with these units has been remarkably good. The few complaints have been traced to non-equipment related issues (like one resident putting a screw through a between wall refrigerant line and loosing charge). One woman who weaves raw wool complaint=ed that she was getting very little heat from her system. She had never cleaned her filters and they were caked with a half inch of wool fibre!)
I am heating a 1200 square foot 2 bedroom '60's single story home with one unit and despite my yet to be replaced single pane windows it keeps the place comfortable (68 F). After the window replacement this summer I expect next winter will be even better. This seems to be a very efficient very reliable product.
Posted by: Gerry Owen | 02/24/2013 at 01:32 PM
Thanks for your contribution, Gerry, good to hear others have had success. I find that even without raw wool around it makes sense to clean the filters 2-3 times a heating season.
Posted by: Marc | 02/25/2013 at 09:17 AM